Scrapling vs Camoufox vs Firecrawl (self-hosted)

Side by side, as alternatives to Firecrawl Cloud. Rows that differ are highlighted; the strongest value in a row is marked. Unknown means no source yet.

ScraplingD4Vinci/Scrapling

Camoufoxdaijro/camoufox

Firecrawl (self-hosted)firecrawl/firecrawl

Firecrawl Cloudpaid product

Cost and coverage

Price

$0 software; you run it

Free plan (1,000 credits a month, no card); Hobby $19/month billed monthly or $16/month billed annually; Standard, Growth, Scale and Enterprise tiers above source ↗

Crawl a site to Markdown

Partly

Yes

Scrape pages (JS-heavy and bot-protected)

Partly

Yes

Structured data extraction

Partly

Yes

Web search with page content

Partly

Yes

Jobs covered

2 of 4 jobs

1 of 4 jobs

4 of 4 jobs

All 4

Popularity and activity (from GitHub)

Stars

88,890

12,684

193,501Top

—

Gain this week

Unknown

—

Signal

Building history

—

Commits / 4 wk

209Top

—

Latest release

v0.5 · 2026-10-17Top

v156.0.1-beta.36 · 2026-10-06

v2.11.0 · 2026-06-19

—

Commits / 12 wk

194

122

540

—

People committing / 12 mo

53+

—

Issues opened / closed, 30 days

12 / 11

59 / 60

32 / 18

—

Facts, with sources on each project page

Runs on my machine?Differs

Yes, Python library on your machine; Docker image also published

Yes, Python or Node.js library that runs a local Firefox build

Yes, self-hosted with Docker Compose (API on port 3002)

Hosted by the vendor

Code licenceDiffers

BSD-3-Clause

MPL-2.0

AGPL-3.0 (copyleft); SDKs and some UI components MIT

—

Model weights licenceDiffers

No separate model weights

No separate model weights; LLM features use the provider you connect

—

Commercial useDiffers

Yes, BSD-3-Clause; README disclaimer frames it as for educational and research purposes

Yes; MPL-2.0 allows commercial use, changes to MPL files must stay open

Yes, under AGPL-3.0 copyleft terms (offer source of modified versions run as a network service)

—

Paid services needed?Differs

None required; proxies optional

A local package/browser installation is documented without a paid API key. Paid proxy services are optional integrations, not a verified universal requirement.

None required for scrape, crawl, map and search; LLM extraction can use Ollama or a paid API

Subscription

HardwareDiffers

Not documented; browser fetchers run Chromium

Linux virtual/Xvfb mode supports software rendering without a GPU. No numerical RAM minimum verified.

No minimum host size published; needs Docker capacity for several services

—

Operating systemsDiffers

Spider documentation explicitly covers Linux/macOS (uvloop) and Windows (winloop) for the optional accelerated event loop; individual browser-fetcher dependencies still need installation

Windows, macOS and Linux browser builds (x86_64; ARM64 on macOS and Linux)

Self-hosting explicitly requires Docker Engine or Docker Desktop and Compose v2, but does not publish a Windows/macOS/Linux host test matrix or native-build support statement

—

Setup effortDiffers

Easy, pip install scrapling; browser fetchers need the fetchers extra and scrapling install

Easy; pip install or npm install

Medium, Docker Compose stack of several services; production needs your own auth, TLS and persistence

—

Stars over time

Switch to Growth % to compare projects of different sizes fairly.

Scrapling
Camoufox
Firecrawl (self-hosted)

Focus a point, use arrow keys, or tap for its value.

Tracked daily since 15 Oct 2026. Dashed history: estimated from public records of when people starred the repo. Lines connect observations only; gaps contain no measured points.

Growth % starts at each project's first observed point in the shown range. Zero-star starts are unavailable.

Notes for a video or post

A plain summary with today's date and a link to the sources. Check each project page before you publish.

Scrapling vs Camoufox vs Firecrawl (self-hosted) (as alternatives to Firecrawl Cloud)
Figures from RepoQuarry, 21 Oct 2026. Sources: https://repoquarry.dev/compare?ids=scrapling,camoufox,firecrawl&product=firecrawl-cloud

Firecrawl Cloud: Free plan (1,000 credits a month, no card); Hobby $19/month billed monthly or $16/month billed annually; Standard, Growth, Scale and Enterprise tiers above
Scrapling: free software; does 2 of 4 Firecrawl Cloud jobs
Camoufox: free software; does 1 of 4 Firecrawl Cloud jobs
Firecrawl (self-hosted): free software; does 4 of 4 Firecrawl Cloud jobs

- Scrapling: 88,890 GitHub stars, 194 commits in 12 weeks, licence BSD-3-Clause
- Camoufox: 12,684 GitHub stars, 122 commits in 12 weeks, licence MPL-2.0
- Firecrawl (self-hosted): 193,501 GitHub stars, 540 commits in 12 weeks, licence AGPL-3.0 (copyleft); SDKs and some UI components MIT

Where they differ:
- Runs on my machine?: Scrapling Yes, Python library on your machine; Docker image also published; Camoufox Yes, Python or Node.js library that runs a local Firefox build; Firecrawl (self-hosted) Yes, self-hosted with Docker Compose (API on port 3002)
- Code licence: Scrapling BSD-3-Clause; Camoufox MPL-2.0; Firecrawl (self-hosted) AGPL-3.0 (copyleft); SDKs and some UI components MIT
- Model weights licence: Scrapling No separate model weights; Camoufox No separate model weights; Firecrawl (self-hosted) No separate model weights; LLM features use the provider you connect
- Commercial use: Scrapling Yes, BSD-3-Clause; README disclaimer frames it as for educational and research purposes; Camoufox Yes; MPL-2.0 allows commercial use, changes to MPL files must stay open; Firecrawl (self-hosted) Yes, under AGPL-3.0 copyleft terms (offer source of modified versions run as a network service)
- Paid services needed?: Scrapling None required; proxies optional; Camoufox A local package/browser installation is documented without a paid API key. Paid proxy services are optional integrations, not a verified universal requirement.; Firecrawl (self-hosted) None required for scrape, crawl, map and search; LLM extraction can use Ollama or a paid API
- Hardware: Scrapling Not documented; browser fetchers run Chromium; Camoufox Linux virtual/Xvfb mode supports software rendering without a GPU. No numerical RAM minimum verified.; Firecrawl (self-hosted) No minimum host size published; needs Docker capacity for several services
- Operating systems: Scrapling Spider documentation explicitly covers Linux/macOS (uvloop) and Windows (winloop) for the optional accelerated event loop; individual browser-fetcher dependencies still need installation; Camoufox Windows, macOS and Linux browser builds (x86_64; ARM64 on macOS and Linux); Firecrawl (self-hosted) Self-hosting explicitly requires Docker Engine or Docker Desktop and Compose v2, but does not publish a Windows/macOS/Linux host test matrix or native-build support statement
- Setup effort: Scrapling Easy, pip install scrapling; browser fetchers need the fetchers extra and scrapling install; Camoufox Easy; pip install or npm install; Firecrawl (self-hosted) Medium, Docker Compose stack of several services; production needs your own auth, TLS and persistence

Stars show popularity, not quality. Check each project page before publishing.

Want share images and a ready video description? Open a project's creator kit.

Numbers: GitHub, fetched nightly. Facts: read from each project's own documentation, with the source on its page. How we check. D4Vinci/Scrapling ↗daijro/camoufox ↗firecrawl/firecrawl ↗

Scrapling vs Camoufox vs Firecrawl (self-hosted)

Stars over time

Notes for a video or post

Cookie preferences

Report a problem