Kortix (formerly Suna) vs OpenManus

Side by side, as alternatives to Manus. Rows that differ are highlighted; the strongest value in a row is marked. Unknown means no source yet.

Also replaces Manus: + Openclaw + DeerFlow + AgenticSeek + Skyvern + OWL + Nanobrowser

Kortix (formerly Suna)kortix-ai/suna

OpenManusFoundationAgents/OpenManus

Manuspaid product

Cost and coverage

Price

$0 software; you run it

See pricing page source ↗

Autonomous web browsing

Partly

Yes

Deep research reports

Yes

File and code tasks in a sandbox

Partly

Yes

Slides generated from a prompt

Yes

Scheduled agent tasks

Partly

Yes

Connectors to your apps

Partly

Yes

Jobs covered

3 of 6 jobs

2 of 6 jobs

All 6

Popularity and activity (from GitHub)

Stars

20,288

58,747Top

—

Gain this week

Unknown

—

Signal

Building history

—

Commits / 4 wk

2,085Top

—

Latest release

v0.14.3 · 2026-10-20Top

v0.3.0 · 2025-04-10

—

Commits / 12 wk

6,162

—

People committing / 12 mo

—

Issues opened / closed, 30 days

0 / 0

8 / 28

—

Facts, with sources on each project page

Runs on my machine?Differs

Self-hosted Docker Compose stack on a laptop, VPS or your own network, or hosted Kortix Cloud

Yes, Python CLI on your own machine; Docker sandbox optional

Hosted by the vendor

Code licenceDiffers

Elastic License 2.0 (source-available, not OSI)

MIT

—

Model weights licenceDiffers

No separate model weights; you bring your own model API keys or a ChatGPT subscription

No separate model weights; you bring your own model API key or a local Ollama model

—

Commercial useDiffers

Internal company use allowed; you may not offer it to others as a hosted or managed service

Yes, MIT code; model terms depend on the provider or local model you choose

—

Paid services needed?Differs

A model provider key or ChatGPT plan is required (local models not documented); self-host setup asks for git, GitHub and Pipedream credentials

An LLM API key is needed unless you run a local model through Ollama; Browser Use Cloud and Daytona sandboxes are optional

Subscription

HardwareDiffers

Not documented beyond Docker for the self-hosted stack

Not documented; needs Python 3.12 and Chrome or Chromium; a local model needs your own GPU

—

Operating systemsDiffers

Desktop clients: Windows 64-bit installer, universal macOS DMG and Linux x86_64 AppImage; CLI on macOS/Linux or Windows via WSL. The self-hosted backend is a separate Docker Compose stack

Windows, macOS and Linux (install steps cover each)

—

Setup effortDiffers

Medium; install the CLI, then one command starts the Docker Compose stack and generates config

Medium; clone, install Python deps with uv or conda, edit config.toml with model keys

—

Stars over time

Switch to Growth % to compare projects of different sizes fairly.

Kortix (formerly Suna)
OpenManus

Focus a point, use arrow keys, or tap for its value.

Tracked daily since 16 Oct 2026. Dashed history: estimated from public records of when people starred the repo. Lines connect observations only; gaps contain no measured points.

Growth % starts at each project's first observed point in the shown range. Zero-star starts are unavailable.

Notes for a video or post

A plain summary with today's date and a link to the sources. Check each project page before you publish.

Kortix (formerly Suna) vs OpenManus (as alternatives to Manus)
Figures from RepoQuarry, 21 Oct 2026. Sources: https://repoquarry.dev/compare?ids=kortix,openmanus&product=manus

Manus: See pricing page
Kortix (formerly Suna): free software; does 3 of 6 Manus jobs
OpenManus: free software; does 2 of 6 Manus jobs

- Kortix (formerly Suna): 20,288 GitHub stars, 6,162 commits in 12 weeks, licence Elastic License 2.0 (source-available, not OSI)
- OpenManus: 58,747 GitHub stars, 8 commits in 12 weeks, licence MIT

Where they differ:
- Runs on my machine?: Kortix (formerly Suna) Self-hosted Docker Compose stack on a laptop, VPS or your own network, or hosted Kortix Cloud; OpenManus Yes, Python CLI on your own machine; Docker sandbox optional
- Code licence: Kortix (formerly Suna) Elastic License 2.0 (source-available, not OSI); OpenManus MIT
- Model weights licence: Kortix (formerly Suna) No separate model weights; you bring your own model API keys or a ChatGPT subscription; OpenManus No separate model weights; you bring your own model API key or a local Ollama model
- Commercial use: Kortix (formerly Suna) Internal company use allowed; you may not offer it to others as a hosted or managed service; OpenManus Yes, MIT code; model terms depend on the provider or local model you choose
- Paid services needed?: Kortix (formerly Suna) A model provider key or ChatGPT plan is required (local models not documented); self-host setup asks for git, GitHub and Pipedream credentials; OpenManus An LLM API key is needed unless you run a local model through Ollama; Browser Use Cloud and Daytona sandboxes are optional
- Hardware: Kortix (formerly Suna) Not documented beyond Docker for the self-hosted stack; OpenManus Not documented; needs Python 3.12 and Chrome or Chromium; a local model needs your own GPU
- Operating systems: Kortix (formerly Suna) Desktop clients: Windows 64-bit installer, universal macOS DMG and Linux x86_64 AppImage; CLI on macOS/Linux or Windows via WSL. The self-hosted backend is a separate Docker Compose stack; OpenManus Windows, macOS and Linux (install steps cover each)
- Setup effort: Kortix (formerly Suna) Medium; install the CLI, then one command starts the Docker Compose stack and generates config; OpenManus Medium; clone, install Python deps with uv or conda, edit config.toml with model keys

Stars show popularity, not quality. Check each project page before publishing.

Want share images and a ready video description? Open a project's creator kit.

Numbers: GitHub, fetched nightly. Facts: read from each project's own documentation, with the source on its page. How we check. kortix-ai/suna ↗FoundationAgents/OpenManus ↗

Kortix (formerly Suna) vs OpenManus

Stars over time

Notes for a video or post

Cookie preferences

Report a problem